SHARPECPA

Sharpe CPA  /  For CPAs  /  Goodwill, intangibles and going concern

The audits the PCAOB keeps sanctioning.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and going concern are where small and mid-size audit firms keep getting fined. The failures are not exotic. Management's projections were accepted, a specialist's report was filed instead of tested, and the reviews that should have caught it signed off. This page lays out what went wrong in the recent orders, a screener for the warning signs, and a checklist that covers the procedures those firms skipped.

The free tools are used at your own risk. They are provided as is, without warranty, and are not accounting, legal or tax advice. All of the work a CPA performs is subject to that person’s or firm’s judgment. Do your own research and verify that the checklist or protocol you are using is valid and up to date. Each tool is built from public sources — see the sources and the terms of use.

The latest order

$500,000, and five layers of review that missed it.

On November 3, 2026 the PCAOB settled with Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP, its engagement partner and its engagement quality reviewer over the 2021 and 2022 audits of a biotechnology company. The findings cover going concern, the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, audit documentation, and the firm’s quality control over engagement performance and monitoring. The firm paid $500,000; the partner $40,000 with a one-year practice limitation; the reviewer $25,000.

What the numbers said

  • Accumulated deficit of $2.9 billion and a $540 million loss for 2022.
  • $188 million due in 2023 against $64 million of cash.
  • Management’s plan assumed 142% revenue growth and a 21% cut in expenses.
  • The auditors’ own adjusted projection still showed a $377 million shortfall.

What happened anyway

  • Unmodified opinion, no going concern paragraph.
  • Under two months later the company disclosed substantial doubt; it filed Chapter 11 on August 9, 2023.
  • The work had passed the partner, the EQR, national office consultations on going concern and goodwill, and two post-issuance reviews.
  • The PCAOB had flagged the 2021 audit before the 2022 audit was performed.

Settled orders are entered without admitting or denying the findings. Figures are as reported from the order; read the order itself (PCAOB Release No. 105-2026-014) before relying on any detail.

The pattern

It is not one firm.

Recent PCAOB settled orders in which goodwill, intangible assets or going concern were part of the findings.

Firm and dateWhat the order foundSanction
Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP
Nov 2026
Going concern accepted on a projection the team’s own work contradicted; goodwill and intangible valuation; documentation; quality control over engagement performance and monitoring.$500,000 firm; partner $40,000 and one-year limitation; EQR $25,000
Zhen Hui (Hong Kong)
Jul 2026
Goodwill about half of total assets, tested for impairment with a discounted cash flow model the auditors did not adequately test; revenue testing; audit committee communications; quality control.$60,000; censure; registration revoked, may reapply after two years
Michael T. Studer CPA
Jun 2025
Did not test management’s estimates behind a $106 million goodwill and intangible impairment; revenue; sign-offs entered for work not performed; no EQR.Permanent bar and revocation; $20,000
L&L CPAs, PA
Jun 2024
No sufficient evidence for the existence, valuation, presentation and disclosure of a purported intangible that was over half of total assets; critical audit matter misdescribed; EQR without due care.$75,000 firm; $50,000 partner; $25,000 EQR
Liggett & Webb partners
May 2024
Fair value of goodwill and intangibles not adequately tested; no substantive procedures specifically responsive to the significant risk; specialist’s findings not evaluated.Sanctions against two partners and the EQR
Halperin Ilanit CPA (Israel)
Mar 2024
Valuation of an intangible asset; critical audit matters not evaluated; documentation; no EQR.$200,000; revoked, three years
Gries & Associates
Mar 2024
No procedures on whether a merger was a reverse acquisition despite red flags; the restatement removed about $3.6 billion of goodwill, 56% of reported assets.$65,000; revoked one year; partner barred
Weinstein International CPA
Dec 2024
Existence and valuation of intangible assets in two audits; due care and skepticism.Censure; revoked, three years; partner barred
RAM Associates & Co.
Aug 2023
Valuation of goodwill and use of a specialist’s work in two audits.$150,000; revoked; partner barred

Where it goes wrong

Six failures, over and over.

01The projection was the evidenceManagement's forecast went into the impairment test or the going concern conclusion without being compared to history, budgets against actual, or anything outside the company.MGO, Zhen Hui, Studer
02The specialist's report was filed, not testedA valuation report is evidence only after the auditor evaluates the specialist, tests the data the company gave them, and challenges the methods and assumptions.RAM, Liggett & Webb
03Nobody asked whether the asset was realWas it a business combination, a reverse acquisition, a related-party transfer? Does the intangible exist, and does it meet the recognition criteria?Gries, L&L, Weinstein
04Going concern and goodwill in separate roomsThe same company cannot be short of cash to survive the year and also generate the cash flows that hold up its goodwill. One forecast has to support both.MGO
05The work did not scale with the balanceIntangibles that were half of total assets got the same light touch as a prepaid. A significant risk needs procedures written for that risk.Zhen Hui, L&L, Liggett & Webb
06Reviews that did not reviewEQRs, consultations and post-issuance reviews signed off, and known inspection findings were not fixed before the next year's audit.MGO, L&L, Studer, Halperin

Screener

Warning signs, before planning is done.

Enter what you know from the trial balance, the forecast and last year’s file. Leave blank what you do not have. It flags the conditions that showed up in the orders above and points to the checklist sections that answer them. Nothing leaves your browser.

Negative if cash was used
Average of the last three years
Actual revenue vs. what management forecast

The thresholds are the firm's own rules of thumb, not requirements of any standard. A clean screen is not evidence.

Checklist

The procedures the sanctioned files were missing.

Each step cites the PCAOB standard for issuer audits and the AICPA section for everyone else. Check them off as the work is done; your progress stays in this browser. Print it or export it to put in the file as a planning aid. It does not replace the firm's audit program.

One forecast

Every estimate has to tell the same story.

The MGO order turned on a contradiction any reviewer could have seen by laying the workpapers side by side. Before the opinion is released, put the forecasts behind these balances on one page and reconcile them.

EstimateUses the forecast forAsk
Going concernCash in and out for at least the next yearDoes the cash forecast use the same revenue and margin as the impairment model?
Goodwill impairmentFive or more years of cash flows plus a terminal valueIf year one is a shortfall, how does the reporting unit's fair value still exceed its carrying amount?
Intangibles and long-lived assetsUndiscounted cash flows of the asset group; remaining useful livesAre customer attrition and useful lives the same ones used in the acquisition valuation?
Deferred tax assetsFuture taxable income for the valuation allowanceIs the company forecasting profits for tax and losses for going concern?
Contingent considerationProbability of hitting earn-out targetsIs the earn-out liability falling while the goodwill model assumes growth?
Debt covenants and classificationCovenant ratios at each test dateDoes the forecast trip a covenant that makes long-term debt current?

Sharpe CPA portal subscribers record this work on the Going concern and DCF workpapers inside each client plan.

Sources

Where this comes from.

The standards control. Case summaries are drawn from PCAOB settled orders and published reports of them; the orders were entered without the respondents admitting or denying the findings. The screener thresholds are the firm's own.